structural-cracks-01
Structural inspection report
Former mill warehouse, Weir Street, Calder Vale

RK-2026-0498

ProjectStructural inspection report
ClientWeir Street Developments Ltd
SiteFormer mill warehouse, Weir Street, Calder Vale
Report typeDefect investigation
ReferenceRK-2026-0498
Issue1
Date22 Apr 2026

Sample report

Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

Issue record and quality management

Status code: S4

RevisionDateStatusDescriptionAuthorCheckedApproved
P0127 Apr 2026DraftDraft for internal checkISRA
A30 Apr 2026IssuedFirst issue to clientISRARA

Distribution

NameOrganisationCopies
Weir Street Developments LtdWeir Street Developments Ltd1

Prepared, checked and authorised in accordance with the quality management procedures of Report Kit 360.

Prepared by

Imogen Stather
MEng CEng MIStructE

Report Kit 360

Date: 30 Apr 2026

Checked by

Rhys Antrobus
BEng (Hons) CEng MCIBSE

Report Kit 360

Date: 30 Apr 2026

Approved by

Rhys Antrobus
BEng (Hons) CEng MCIBSE

Report Kit 360

Date: 30 Apr 2026

Limitations. This report is limited to the elements of structure described. Building services, timber decay, damp penetration, contamination and asbestos are specialist matters and are outside its scope unless expressly stated. Hidden or inaccessible parts of the structure were not inspected and cannot be guaranteed free from defect.

This report is confidential to Weir Street Developments Ltd and is provided for the purpose described in the introduction. Report Kit 360 accepts no responsibility to any third party who relies on it, in whole or in part, without our prior written agreement. Where our report refers to information supplied by others we have assumed it to be accurate unless stated otherwise.

Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

Executive summary

Weir Street Developments Ltd asked us to inspect cracking in the north wall of the former mill warehouse before its conversion to apartments. The three-storey building (about 1885) is of solid brick load-bearing walls with timber floors on cast-iron columns. A stepped crack up to 6 mm wide (BRE category 3) runs from the ground-floor window at grid C to the parapet, with finer diagonal cracks at grid D. The pattern, the taper (wider at the top) and the position over the culverted mill race indicate differential settlement of the north wall at its western end, probably long-standing but recently reactivated by leakage from the culvert. The wall is stable at present. We recommend a six-month programme of crack monitoring, a CCTV survey of the culvert, trial pits to confirm the foundation, and, depending on the results, local underpinning and stitching of the cracks before conversion.

0: 11: 12: 13: 24: 15: 0
#LocationRatingTypeSummary
6Timber floor bearings — Grids B/2 and C/20Sound; no distortion.
4Internal plaster — First floor behind C11As C1Hairline cracks C3 and C4.
2North wall — Grid D, above window N42Settlement; old arch repairDiagonal crack C2, 2 mm.
1North wall — Grid C, window N3 to parapet3Differential settlement over the culvertStepped crack C1, 2 mm to 6 mm, tapering wider at the top.
5Culvert inlet — Yard, north-west corner3DebrisPartly blocked; overflowing in rain.
3Parapet — Grid C4Movement; corrosionCoping displaced 10 mm; wall tie corroded through.
Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

1 Introduction

Commission

Client and instructionWeir Street Developments Ltd; email instruction 2 April 2026Purpose of the inspectionInvestigate the cause and significance of cracking in the north wall before conversion
Inspection methodVisual inspection from ground level, cherry picker and internally; crack widths by comparator; levels by digital levelExclusionsFoundations (not exposed); roof structure (viewed from the top floor only)
Date(s) of inspection22 Apr 2026AttendeesThe author; the client's facilities manager
Access limitationsRoof accessed by ladder to the eaves only; plant room lockedDocuments and drawings reviewed2021 condition report; architect's survey drawings WSD-A-001 to 004

The warehouse was built around 1885 for the adjoining cotton mill and used for storage until 2019. A previous condition report (2021) noted hairline cracking at grid C. The client's architect reported that the crack had widened during the winter of 2025 to 2026, which prompted this inspection.

Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

2 Form of structure

Structure

Orientation convention used in this reportElevations named by compass point; grid A to F west to east, 1 to 4 south to northNumber of storeysThree
Structural frameLoad-bearing solid brick walls with internal cast-iron columnsFloorsTimber joists on timber beams and cast-iron columns
Roof structureTimber queen-post trusses, slate coveringCladding / external wallsSolid brick, 450 to 560 mm
Foundations (known or assumed)Unknown; assumed brick footings on clayLoad pathRoof and floors to external walls and columns, to footings
Movement jointsNoneDate of construction (approximate)About 1885

Loads from the timber floors are carried by cast-iron columns on a 3.6 m grid and by the external walls, which are 450 mm to 560 mm solid brick. The roof is a timber queen-post structure spanning between the north and south walls. Foundations are unknown; brick footings on clay are assumed. There are no movement joints. The mill race passes beneath the north-west corner in a brick culvert.

structural-cracks-01

Figure 2.1 — North elevation with the inspection area and photograph locations

Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

3 Inspection area

3.1 North elevation and ground floor

1. The north elevation was inspected from ground level and from a cherry picker; the internal face was inspected at ground and first floor. 2. Crack C1 runs in a stepped pattern through the bed and perpend joints from the sill of window N3 to the parapet, 6 mm wide at the top tapering to 2 mm at the sill; the brickwork is fractured through in places. 3. Crack C2 is a diagonal crack 2 mm wide above window N4 at grid D, following the line of an old arch repair. 4. Cracks C3 and C4 are hairline cracks in the internal plaster at first floor directly behind C1. 5. The parapet coping is displaced 10 mm at grid C and the wall tie exposed there is heavily corroded. 6. The timber floor bearings at grid B/2 and C/2 are sound; no distortion of the floor was measured. 7. Surface water from the yard discharges towards the culvert inlet, which is partly blocked.

structural-cracks-02

North elevation showing the stepped crack at grid C

structural-cracks-03

Crack C1 with tell-tale installed

structural-cracks-04

Diagonal cracking above the ground-floor window, grid D

structural-cracks-05

Corroded wall tie exposed at the parapet

Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

4 Defect register

Defects are given a severity category based on the BRE Digest 251 damage classification:

ColourRatingMeaning
0Negligible: hairline cracking under 0.1 mm. Aesthetic; no repair.
1Very slight: cracks up to 1 mm. Aesthetic; dealt with by normal decoration.
2Slight: cracks up to 5 mm. Serviceability; fill, some repointing, ease doors and windows.
3Moderate: cracks 5–15 mm or several around 3 mm. Serviceability; open up and patch, repoint; service pipes may fracture.
4Severe: cracks 15–25 mm. Stability; break out and replace sections of wall, frames distorted, floors sloping, walls leaning or bulging.
5Very severe: cracks over 25 mm. Stability; partial or complete rebuilding, shoring required.
Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498
RefElementLocationCondition / descriptionCauseRatingPhotoMeasurementRecommended actionTimescale
6Timber floor bearingsGrids B/2 and C/2Sound; no distortion.0None
4Internal plasterFirst floor behind C1Hairline cracks C3 and C4.As C110.3 mmMake good after stitchingBefore conversion
2North wallGrid D, above window N4Diagonal crack C2, 2 mm.Settlement; old arch repair22 mmMonitor; stitch with C16 months
1North wallGrid C, window N3 to parapetStepped crack C1, 2 mm to 6 mm, tapering wider at the top.Differential settlement over the culvert3
6 mmMonitor; trial pits; underpin and stitch1 to 6 months
5Culvert inletYard, north-west cornerPartly blocked; overflowing in rain.Debris3
CCTV survey and clear1 month
3ParapetGrid CCoping displaced 10 mm; wall tie corroded through.Movement; corrosion4
10 mmFence off; remove loose coping; replace tiesImmediate

Table 4.1 — Crack classification (BRE Digest 251 bands)

RefElementLocationCrack width (mm)BRE 251 categoryClassOrientationTaperMonitoring
C1North wallGrid C, N3 to parapet6.002AestheticStepped, diagonalWider at topYes, TT1
C2North wallGrid D, above N42.001AestheticDiagonalUniformYes, TT2
C3Internal plasterFirst floor, grid C0.301ServiceabilityDiagonalUniformNo
C4Internal plasterFirst floor, grid C/D0.203AestheticVerticalUniformNo
C5ParapetGrid C coping joint10.001#REF!HorizontalUniformYes, TT3
C6South wallGrid E, ground floor0.50#REF!#REF!VerticalUniformNo
Highest damage category recorded#REF!
Widest crack recorded10.00 mm

4.1.1 Monitoring

Table 4.2 — Crack monitoring record

Tell-tale / stud refLocationInstalledBaseline (mm)Reading 1 (date / mm)Reading 2 (date / mm)Net change (mm)
TT1C1 at parapet2026-04-226
TT2C2 above N42026-04-222
TT3Parapet joint, grid C2026-04-2210
Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

5 Discussion

The crack pattern (stepped, tapering, wider at the top, located over the culvert) is characteristic of differential settlement at the north-west corner rather than thermal movement or lintel failure. The reactivation in winter is consistent with softening of the clay by leakage from the culvert, which is partly blocked and overflowing at the inlet. Category 3 damage is serviceability rather than stability, but continued movement could affect the stability of the parapet and the window heads. Corrosion of the wall ties at the parapet is a separate, age-related defect.

Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

6 Recommendations

Immediate: fence off the pavement below the parapet at grid C and remove the loose coping. Within one month: CCTV survey of the culvert and clear the inlet; install three tell-tales and take monthly readings for six months. Within three months: two trial pits at grid C to confirm the foundation and soil. Before conversion: subject to monitoring, local underpinning at grids B to D (about 9 m), helical-bar stitching of cracks C1 and C2, replacement of the parapet ties and repointing. A structural engineer should review the monitoring results before the conversion design is finalised.

Table 6.1 — Schedule of recommendations

RefFurther investigation / actionWhyWhenBy whom
R1Fence off the pavement and remove the loose copingFalling masonry riskImmediateClient
Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

Appendix A — Photographs

structural-cracks-03

Internal face of the north wall, ground floor

structural-cracks-04

Timber floor bearing at grid B/2

structural-cracks-05

North elevation showing the stepped crack at grid C

structural-cracks-06

Crack C1 with tell-tale installed

Structural inspection reportRK-2026-0498

Appendix B — Calculations

Bearing pressure check on the north wall footing: characteristic loads from the roof, two timber floors and the wall self-weight to BS EN 1991-1-1, assumed 900 mm wide brick footing, presumed bearing resistance of 100 kN/m² for firm clay.

Table B.1 — Calculation table (units in the unit column)

ItemSymbolValueUnitSource / note
Roof load to north wallg_roof6.200kN/mSlates, timber and snow
Floor loads to north wall (two floors)g_floor14.800kN/mDead and imposed, residential
Wall self-weightg_wall48.600kN/m0.5 m x 10.8 m x 9 kN/m³
Total line loadN#CIRC!kN/mSum of the above
Footing widthB0.900mAssumed
Bearing pressureq#CIRC!kN/m²Compare with 100 kN/m² presumed